Innovation has a locus.
The relevant unit is the product line and the firm that accumulates its own knowledge.
Professor of Economics · Duke University
I study how firms accumulate knowledge, how industries organize innovation, and how those decisions become sustained economic growth.
Pietro F. PerettoMacroeconomics · Industrial organization · International trade
Growth depends on the scale of activity at the firm—not mechanically on the scale of the economy.
This question connects industrial organization and macroeconomics. Firms do not merely apply an economy-wide technology: they build knowledge, choose the direction of innovation, enter and exit markets, and organize the people who make innovation possible.
My work develops a tractable theory of that process. The same architecture explains why scale effects disappear, how economies take off from stagnation, why market structure evolves, and how policy, trade, resources, demography, and corporate governance shape growth.
Firm size, rivalry, fixed costs, entry, and the evolution of market structure.
Incumbent firms build knowledge in house while new product lines reorganize the economy.
Development makes innovative firms viable, turning stagnation into sustained growth.
Ownership, managerial delegation, taxation, and governance determine innovative investment.
Not a list of topics, but a cumulative account of how the capitalist engine of growth works.
The relevant unit is the product line and the firm that accumulates its own knowledge.
A larger economy supports more firms. Product proliferation prevents population from mechanically raising long-run growth.
Firms must become large enough for in-house R&D—and later managerial delegation—to be profitable.
Agriculture, trade, demography, resources, disease, and government affect when takeoff occurs and how economies diverge.
Corporate governance is the internal organization of the mechanism that turns knowledge into growth.
Develops the firm-centered Schumpeterian framework: creative accumulation, endogenous market structure, competition, policy, resources, trade, heterogeneity, and turbulence.
Uses that framework to develop a theory of the history of growth: pre-industrial stagnation, endogenous takeoff, structural transformation, divergence, and the demographic transition.
View contents ↗Courses at Duke University
For students and non-specialists
In the old growth model, technological progress arrives as “manna from heaven,” shifting an aggregate production function. Here, growth is instead the outcome of firms spending resources to improve products and processes, entrepreneurs creating new markets, and institutions shaping the rewards to those decisions. Schumpeterian theory makes this process—its conflicts, transitions, and unintended consequences—the center of macroeconomics.