STUDENT EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE INSTRUCTION AT PRINCETON UNIVERSITY conomics 303 SPRING TERM 2000 B. Rossi (Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class) PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING u n a I c E t c x e e c m A p e v t c e a p F G 0 r b a 0 e u a i 0 n n 9 e r r d t t e LECTURES: 1. Stimulation of independent thinking 50% 50% 2 4.0 2. Clear presentation of subject matter 50% 50% 2 4.0 3. Overall quality of lectures 50% 50% 2 4.0 SEMINARS: 4. Stimulation of independent thinking 5. Ability to raise challenging questio 6. Ability to help clarify course mater 7. Ability to encourage participation 8. Instructor's responsiveness 9. Overall quality of seminars PRECEPTS, CLASSES: 10. Ability to raise challenging questio 50% 50% 2 4.5 11. Ability to help clarify course mater 100% 2 4.0 12. Ability to encourage participation 50% 50% 2 3.5 13. Instructor's responsiveness 50% 50% 2 4.5 14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 50% 50% 2 4.0 LANGUAGE COURSES: 15. Helpfulness in reading the language 16. Helpfulness in speaking the language 17. Helpfulness in writing the language 18. overall help in using the language LABORATORIES: 19. Usefulness to lectures and readings 20. Instructor's organization and guidan 21. Overall quality of laboratories READINGS: 22. Stimulation of independent thinking 50% 50% 2 2.5 23. Clear presentation of subject matter 50% 50% 2 2.0 24. Overall quality of readings 50% 50% 2 2.0 PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS: 25. Guidance in preparation of written w 50% 50% 2 4.0 26. Comments in response to written work 50% 50% 2 3.5 27. overall value of papers,reports,exam 50% 50% 2 3.5 GENERAL: 28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 50% 50% 2 4.0 29. Contribution to critical evaluation 50% 50% 2 4.0 30. Contribution to interest in subject 50% 50% 2 4.0 31. Overall quality of the course 50% 50% 2 4.0 Evaluations Returned 2